CO129-255 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1892 [5-7] — Page 334

cause of this opposition to it –

(It is got a matter I think for the Law ffries)

Nothing

about th.8

1277 M. Bramstor

more has come

subject.

•

from the colony I have been looking through the papers but cannot find how the $1800n was calculated. The frentary State's despatch on 18457 45 toned

the grant of compensation

88.

I

and 8, Jauctioned

to the Whout hubdows

Wharf

Arindal

and 180000 # was insuted in the ordinance

16.01.89. a

16.07.89.

without remark

Mr. Wingfield

See page 10

without remonts & a

ai

see para

4 Pat

S

afford

i far as

I can see

29. Ang

C.PL

Certain Jursons were allowed.

ofthis dispatch - Certain Jussons,

at but &

having

"Mise

trip, lik

to Erect Whavns on the fruction ofthe Harbour_ beory I showed say

a Horeath hime to occupy the site ofthe whare, for which apparently they paid go renta Ishation may have bun their tenure it was absolutely determined by Section 6. Of thos Artimane 16 of 1889 which provides for reclamation works; white will absorb part of the harbour including the site of the whams. Itumed appear from par. 7.48 of dep. 230 of 19 Du. 18 m 18459/00 that they are to be allowse to cruch new shawns in front othe reclaimer hand, & that the marine with an paying for the Automation rooks)

holdes are to pay past of

A

1892. m. 52′

333

The cost of umning and re-rrecting the whanrs.

The and 16 of 89 accordingly provides dec. 7. A sum not

2

Saudis If 180.00 for this purpose

The Governor has introdaux a Bill Monding Machining for ascertaining

• amount of Compensation the paie & Each wharf holder, or there of these fursms claimed be heard by

persons by

Cormack against the Brodinance. The farma

Buled that this

Cinere out in Alenses as it was not a cake & where individue

Standing order of rights or interests of property are greentiarly affected = They Inotion & ark that the L.0. May be consulted on the front.

I think the Governor

was rightly advised bythe Att",

and if you concur - The fort might be that that he has sort Thought it rempary & Consult the Atty fond. a doting

Mumb

soli fint and that he is abrian by the (rown larger of this Repartment that the Governs ruling was correct

I carnet

agrer

8.30

I Wish that, whatcom

masheer been the original rights

abrend

2

Thi

the time

of the wharf holders, the hun acquired & aprement of the let-awers ratified of

rights of property in the sum met macceding $10,000 awarded to them Gewer is compensation and that

Bill providing for the afupment &

on a

individual wharf holder's where

<

Each

of that find

Bill peculiarly affecting individual sites

er interests of present-

But the Lea

Elig

CA

arride the former

state compet arride the

President of the Council-

and I should

se reples till the fute to do inform the protester

tances his lethich destr and that in there circumstances offers has but consulted the 2.0. and dres and profeen the refres any opinion correctness & she ruling. Els so ches

P.TO.